A fatal railway accident in the Mexican state of Oaxaca has resulted in the deaths of at least 13 people, an incident expected to reignite opposition criticisms regarding the speed and management of the country's major government projects.
The disaster happened on the Interoceanic Train, a route developed to connect the Atlantic Ocean and Pacific across the narrowest part of the Isthmus of Tehuantepec. This project was designed to provide an competing rail corridor to the Panama Canal, with the goal of spurring regional growth in the area.
“We are going to thoroughly investigate the reasons behind this accident,” affirmed the head of state.
The leader announced that, of the around 250 individuals on board, another 98 were injured, with five of those in critical condition. The official added plans to travel to Oaxaca to meet those involved.
Flagship Project of Previous Administration
The Interoceanic Train was a cornerstone development scheme of the former leader, whose term ended the year before. This venture was a hallmark of his government's developmental agenda for the southern region.
Another multi-billion dollar railway undertaking from that period, a tourist and cargo loop around the Yucatán Peninsula, was also part of the wider plan to kickstart the economic fortunes of a historically poorer part of the country.
Building Management and Safety Concerns
The construction of both train projects was overseen by the nation's military, marking a notable expansion of its role in national projects. They were built at an rapid rate, beating forecasts to be partially opened before the end of that government.
However, this fast-paced schedule had also sparked significant apprehensions over safety standards.
- Sunday's derailment was the third occurrence on the Interoceanic Train within the past twelve months.
- This involves an previous crash this month when a train struck a truck at a crossing.
- The other major rail project has also had several non-fatal derailments.
Demands for Review and Suspension
In the aftermath of the tragedy, the chief of a key rival party called for an prompt pause in the development and management of all comparable projects.
This pause was proposed until the completion of a full technical review. The party emphasized that the tragedy "demands prompt explanations."
In response, the president maintained that the train had been running in total compliance with all safety requirements. Promises were given that the government would be "accountable" in both the construction and running of these strategic projects.
